[1] BANSZERUS L, SCHMITZ M, ENGELS S, et al. Ultrahigh-mobility graphene devices from chemical vapor deposition on reusable copper [J]. Science Advances, 2015, 1: e1500222.
[2] DENG J, XIA B, MA X, et al. Epitaxial growth of ultraflat stanene with topological band inversion[J]. Nature Materials, 2018, 17(12): 1081–1086.
[3] XIAO H Y, ZU X T, HE X, et al. Sb adsorption on Cu(1 1 0), (1 0 0), and (1 1 1) surfaces[J]. Chemical Physics, 2006, 325(2/3): 519–524.
[4] 佘利敏,于迎辉,卢双赞,等. Sb /Cu(111) 表面上酞氰钴分子的吸附取向与自组装结构研究[J]. 电子显微学报,2013,32(3):219-223.
[5] DENK M, DENK R, HOHAGE M, et al. Effect of postgrowth oxygen exposure on the magnetic properties of Ni on the Cu-CuO stripe phase[J]. Physical Review B, 2012, 85(1): 014423.
[6] ERNST K H, LUDVIKSSON A, ZHANG R, et al. Growth model for metal films on oxide surfaces: Cu on ZnO(0001)-O[J]. Physical Review B, 1993, 47(20): 13782–13796.
[7] DIEBOLD U, PAN J M, MADEY T E. Growth mode of ultrathin copper overlayers on TiO2(110)[J]. Physical Review B, 1993, 47(7): 3868–3876.
[8] FORTUNATO E, BARQUINHA P, MARTINS R. Oxide semiconductor thin-film transistors: a review of recent advances[J]. Advanced Materials, 2012, 24(22): 2945–2986.
[9] YU X, MARKS T J, FACCHETTI A. Metal oxides for optoelectronic applications[J]. Nature Materials, 2016, 15(4): 383–396.
[10] HEREMANS J, THRUSH C M, LIN Y M, et al. Transport properties of antimony nanowires[J]. Physical Review B, 2001, 63(8): 854061–854068.
[11] ZHANG M, WANG Z, XI G, et al. Large-scale synthesis of antimony nanobelt bundles[J]. Journal of Crystal Growth, 2004, 268(1/2): 215–221.
[12] HU H, MO M, YANG B, et al. A rational complexing-reduction route to antimony nanotubes[J]. New Journal of Chemistry, 2003, 27(8): 1161–1163.
[13] ZHANG S, YAN Z, LI Y, et al. Atomically thin arsenene and antimonene: semimetal-semiconductor and indirect-direct band-gap transitions[J]. Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2015, 54(10): 3112–3115.
[14] NIU T, ZHOU W, ZHOU D, et al. Modulating epitaxial atomic structure of antimonene through interface design[J]. Advanced Materials, 2019, 31(29): 1902606.
[15] ZHU S Y, SHAO Y, WANG E, et al. Evidence of topological edge states in buckled antimonene monolayers[J]. Nano Letters, 2019, 19(9): 6323–6329.
[16] WANG X, SONG J, QU J. Antimonene: From experimental preparation to practical application[J]. Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2019, 58(6): 1574–1584.
[17] KRESSE G, HAFNER J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals[J]. Physical Review B, 1993, 47: 558.
[18] KRESSE G, FURTHMÜLLER J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set[J]. Physical Review B, 1996, 54: 11169.
[19] PERDEW J P, BURKE K, ERNZERHOF M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1996, 77: 3865.
[20] KRESSE G, JOUBERT D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method[J]. Physical Review B, 1999, 59: 1758.
[21] WIAME F, MAURICE V, MARCUS P. Initial stages of oxidation of Cu(1 1 1)[J]. Surface Science, 2007, 601(5): 1193–1204.
[22] JENSEN F, BESENBACHER F, LAEGSGAARD E, et al. Oxidation of Cu(111): two new oxygen induced reconstructions[J]. Surface Science Letters, 1991, 259(111): L774–L780.
[23] MATSUMOTO T, BENNETT R A, STONE P, et al. Scanning tunneling microscopy studies of oxygen adsorption on Cu (111) [J]. Surface Science, 2001, 471(1/2/3): 225–245.
[24] YANG F, CHOI Y, LIU P, et al. Autocatalytic reductibon of a Cu2O/Cu(111) surface by CO: STM, XPS, and DFT studies[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2010, 114(40): 17042–17050.
[25] THERRIEN A J, ZHANG R, LUCCI F R, et al. Structurally accurate model for the “29” -structure of CuxO/Cu(111): a DFT and STM study[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2016, 120(20): 10879–10886.
[26] AN W, XU F, STACCHIOLA D, et al. Potassium-induced effect on the structure and chemical activity of the CuxO/Cu(111) (x ≤ 2) surface: a combined scanning tunneling microscopy and density functional theory study[J]. ChemCatChem, 2015, 7(23): 3865–3872.
[27] DORENBOS G, BREEMAN M, BOERMA D O. Low-energy ion-scattering study of the oxygen-induced reconstructed p(2 × 1) and c(6 × 2) surfaces of Cu(110)[J]. Physical Review B, 1993, 47: 1580–1588.
[28] COULMAN D J, WINTTERLIN J, BEHM R J, et al. Novel mechanism for the formation of chemisorption phases: the (2 × 1 )O-Cu(110) “added-row” reconstruction[J]. Physical Review Letters, 1990, 64(15): 1761–1764.
[29] POUTHIER V, RAMSEYER C, GIRARDET C, et al.Characterization of the reconstruction by means of molecular adsorption [J]. Physical Review B, 1998, 58(15): 9998–10002.
[30] CABRERA-SANFELIX P, LIN C, ARNAU A, et al. Hybridization between Cu-O chain and Cu(110) surface states in the O(2 × 1)/Cu(110) surface from first principles[J]. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, 2013, 25: 135003.
[31] DUAN X, WARSCHKOW O, SOON A, et al. Density functional study of oxygen on Cu(100) and Cu(110) surfaces[J]. Physical Review B, 2010, 81(7): 075430.
[32] LIU Q, LI L, CAI N, et al. Oxygen chemisorption-induced surface phase transitions on Cu(110)[J]. Surface Science, 2014, 627: 75–84.